Thursday, May 31, 2007

The People-based Theory

I've always wondered why the Philippine Science High School, despite being a government institution, retains its reputation as the premier high school of the country.

Government institutions - hospitals, schools, police and fire stations included - have always been seen as inefficient and sometimes even ineffective in delivering the services expected of them. There are many reasons cited to explain this very dismal evaluation of government services. Lack of funding, corruption and incompetence are some of the most often cited. But why does it seem that Pisay has acquired an immunity to this contagious inefficiency spreading in the government?

I've often observed that there is an excess of freedom and discretion in Pisay. Its structure is basically having a person in-charge and everything under him is under his discretion. Apparently, there are so few rules in Pisay that a fine line now exists between guidelines and actual rules (the former being recommendations only) as pointed out by a member of the faculty (ayaw ko na ireveal haha). As another teacher has observed, most of the rules we have in Pisay are responses to actual events and not products of foresight (as I think they should be).

This unstructured structure, no matter how messy it looks, seems to be the magic that makes Pisay the way it is. One way of viewing it is lack of governing rules. The other more positive perception is a people-based structure. The people that run the system are the most important parts. There is immense trust accorded to the people that make it work.

One fine example to prove how people-based Pisay is is Ms. Serrano. I considered her a pillar of the system, someone who would spend her best and last years serving the institution. She's been in Pisay so long, she had acquired the experience necessary to respond to new challenges facing the school. Her move to leave Pisay was a depressing surprise. I will no longer delve into the reasons why she left, but I must say that the most of the really few solid regulations Pisay has are ineffective in the perspective of doing good for the community. During our graduation practices, some of the teachers would comment "si Ma'am Serrano may alam nito e". I believe she left Pisay without effectively sharing the wisdom she acquired from her years of service to her successors. Opinion ko lang naman yun :D

One bad experience I had with this people-based phenomenon was during our short and yet strenuous stint as the members of the Student Alliance Electoral Board. Ma'am Samala had just left for New Zealand and there was no one left in Pisay who knew the nitty-gritty of running an election. We had two veteran SA officers but because none of the things that happened in this election happened during their SA years, we had no idea how it is supposed to be handled. Of course, the SA has its Election Code and Constitution. To our dismay, it did very little to help us resolve the issues. The SA has been in violation of its own code and constitution for almost half a decade already and haha it was during our watch that Pisay uncovered its defects. It seems the SA has always relied on the unwritten traditions followed by the previous administration and had not bothered to look into the paperwork. The SA was people-based and it somehow compromised one of the functions of the system. At the end of the experience, we had to make the Election Code less discretionary and more rigid (as it should really be).

It seems Pisay being people-based arises from the lack of solid rules to govern aspects of the Pisay community. It is the natural and spontaneous response of individuals who are where they are because of their ability to adapt and ingenuity.

This underlines that the people is what makes Pisay great - the heterogeneous mix of faculty, staff, administration, alumni, parents and students. The science curriculum, the intense academic load, the better-than-the-usual government facilities, the amazing activities, the intimidating name of Philippine Science High School - all simply provide the framework by which this mix of people work and interact for the good of themselves, the people around them and society in general. This system echoes the invisible hand theory of Adam Smith. The lack of rules allow people's actions to shape almost exclusively the course of the community. It is this freedom that enables growth and development at the personal and community levels. This acts as a catalyst for the students to become scientists - to acquire the necessary skills of critical thinking, individual confidence and competence, inquisitiveness and ingenuity. These are the most important lessons Pisay imparts on its students and the funny thing about it is it comes partly from being a people-based system.

The people-based system also ensures that this tradition of excellence lives on. Only the best and the brightest and the most courageous breed of students, teachers, staff and parents are attracted to be part of the system. It's a cycle that will always go in favor of Pisay.

However, it is still necessary to safeguard what little rigidity there is in the structure because these have set the ground rules for the continued evolution of Pisay. Simple rules on haircut and ID go a long way in subconsciously instilling discipline in a very fluid environment like Pisay. The community must remain conscious of when a people-based system is beneficial to it our not. Absolute power corrupts absolutely as they say and people are so prone to corruption. There must always be a balance. Fortunately, in Pisay, it seems it has found its balance.

This theory may also explain why the University of the Philippines remains the top university of the country despite being a state university. The relative autonomy UP has with respect to other state universities may account for this. It is note-worthy that the PSHS has an obvious affinity with UP with a big percentage of its graduates coming into the university and the UP President being part of the PSHS Board of Trustees.

Looking at a more macroscopic view, the people-based system seems to be more of a curse than a blessing for the government. I find it odd however that there is no lack of laws and rules to govern the country and yet the people-based system persists. I guess it's in the ethos of the people already to view the government by the people who lead them not by the institutions themselves. I'm not sure of my terms but I think the politics in the country is too patriarchal and messianic as well (Ma'am Doplon has a wonderful article on this: http://crazyadventure.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/messiah-politics). Our leaders have packaged our national institutions as extensions of themselves. That is why the MRT is not a project of the DOTC but the president and low-cost housing Mike Defensor and not the NHA. And this is also why criticizing the president as a person using the office for her personal gain is tantamount to destabilization of the entire government.

The people-based system is another reason why the Philippines is not ready for the parliamentary system. In that form of government, the leader of the nation can change overnight. The institutions must first be reformed to make them independent and self-sustaining that they do not need a prime minister or president to make them run properly.

The premise in Pisay is that good people run the system. In the national scene however, it seems the bad eggs are far more influential than the good ones. They have taken the people-based system and twisted it to their advantage. There is simply too much discretion in the national positions and this has been used often for the benefit of the leaders and not the people.

Being a democracy, I guess, has partly turned us into a people-based society. I really like democracy because a true one empowers the people. I believe we are in a true democracy and that we are simply getting what we deserve.

In conclusion, the real fuel that keeps the flame of Pisay burning is that people that run it. In the national perspective, as Sir Martin has said, it is the people that build a nation. The destiny of our nation is really in all our hands.

10 comments:

FNF said...

Again, great post ;) 3 comments.

1. Yep, in Pisay, there is a premise that the people are good. Or at least there is a healthy tension (among students, admin, union, and other members of the community) that bring out the good. Sorry for this pseudo-Marxist perspective on politics pero problems kasi would arise when those in power (whether they be majority or minority) lack good principles. These days, morality is seen as relative. My prof even told us, "there's no such thing as good, only the socially acceptable." I don't agree with my prof but this is how things are viewed these days. There you also see your people-based theory at work.

2. It's also good that you pointed out the problems that would arise in a person-based system. While we enjoy the spontaneity and creativity that flow from the lack of solid rules, the unwritten tradition does have its setbacks: when the person is gone, what happens? I guess that's why it's important to make oneself indispensable and prepare for continuity. ie by training others and yes, writing down one's notes of experience. (This is why I'm also seriously considering entering research along with teaching.)

3. But there seems to be some gray area here. What exactly do you mean by "People?" By people-based, do you refer to the system that anchors itself on individual persons (personalities like GMA, Mike Defensor, and Ma'am Serrano)? Or are you referring to people as the collective body?

4. You should run for Sanggu! Haha.

Rob said...

Thank you for being really patient in reading my very long posts. haha.

1. Maybe I should start preparing myself for those comments of relativism etc haha. I was talking to one friend who is already taking philosophy in La Salle and apparently my views on stuff are stupid in the philosophical sense, often riddled with biases stemming from my heritage and faith.

2. Haha sa experience po namin, mahirap nga po mag-iwan ng detailed easy-to-use instructions for the next generation. haha. pero these instructions are really important especially because life is fragile and change is constant in all aspects of human society. haha.

3. oo nga malabo nga po pala. haha. It may be both in any case. Ang contrast that i looked at is between a system that taps on the person's unique judgement and perception as opposed to a system that looks at its own hard-coded programming to know how to make it work. I guess in the long run, we should move to trusting the people as a collective body more than the prominent individuals.

4. hahahahaha dream but i don't know how to make it a reality haha.

FNF said...

Hahaha. Sinulat ko pala 3 comments when I posted 4. My gosh, I'm not a math person! Haha.

1. Well, your views are not stupid in a philosophical sense. It also depends on which school of thought you are following. Views in certain systems conflict with others kasi.

2. Yeah nga, it's hard to write down detailed explanations for practical purposes but i guess leaving general guidelines (that give room for flexibility) would be a great legacy to leave.

3. Hehe. Pero diba we cannot undermine the fact that collective body is composed of individuals? Hala nag-mix na! (Now we need Martin to get us out of this mess.)I guess what's difficult lang is we have underdeveloped human capital in our current democratic context. How can we "tap on each person's unique judgment" if they don't believe in their own capacity for self-realization? It would be great if every Filipino is as empowered as the "prominent" individuals in pisay; that would be a Utopian democracy! Haha.

4. Hayaan mo, if I end up there, I'll require my classes to vote for you. Just kidding. Let's start with this: After I finish reading Barack Obama's book "The Audacity of Hope," I'll lend it to you in school. Required reading!

See ya!

mintycinnamon said...

hehe...
go PISAY...
the way Pisay is run is actually the ideal way of running a country...
people working for people...
as in our leaders work to serve our best interests...
sana sa future Pisay alumni ang maging presidente...
hehehe...

clarisse said...

there rob. your becoming president in the future will start with sanggu kaya magrun ka na. :D

Anonymous said...

ryan to. wow naman. blog entry kung blog entry! kudos! that was great!

agree ako kay ma'am frances: "These days, ... 'there's no such thing as good, only the socially acceptable.'" pero yun nga, kagaya ulit ng sinabi niya, mali yung perspective na yun eh. parang nung namimili ng presidente yung mga magulang ko noong 2004 elections. They were supposed to vote for Roco pero matatalo lang daw. So they rather vote for Gloria since she is relatively better than FPJ kahit na, technically, Gloria herself is not a good president.

at oo nga, run for the sanggu! simulan mo sa barangay namin! (para maging mas matino at mas maganda. hehe.) since you still technically lack 28 years to become president, simulan mo na sa sangguniang kabataan. ako campaign managaer mo! tapos si cheska at dane gagawa ng jinggle!

di nga. seryoso yun ah. run for sanggu. :)

FNF said...

Just to clarify: what I meant was Sanggunian ng mga Mag-aaral ng mga Paaralang Loyola ng Pamantasang Ateneo de Manila (Sanggu)
hahaha.

pwede rin manang Sangguniang Kabataan (SK).

Rob said...

hahaha. differences in world views. si ryan UP hahaha.

Anonymous said...

Pffft. May sanggu pa kayong nalalaman, president na agad! If people knew that somewhere there's a 17-year-old like you, wala na yang age requirement na yan eh. Haha. Pero seriously. Ang hirap naman maghintay ng 28 years, baka patay na tayo lahat dahil sa global warming by then eh. Di na namin makikita ung greatness mo. :(

Anonymous said...

rob for president :)