Commitment is difficult and seemingly impossible in this age.
Is it possible to commit yourself to something without knowing the entirety of what you need to do and what you will face in doing it?
Is it possible to commit your entire life to the Lord and His mission for you?
Yes. Mary, the Mother of God, did just that with this single statement:
"Behold I am the handmaid of the Lord. May it be done to me according to your word."
- Luke 1:38
How?
Not by her own power, but only through the grace of God.
"for nothing will be impossible with God." - Luke 1:37
We need only say yes, and God will do the rest.
Saturday, December 8, 2007
Saturday, November 24, 2007
Distrust
It's always such a fruitful experience to meet people like Sir Vlad who seem to draw out insights you wouldn't think about on your own.
My meeting him and talking to him about my current adventures in Ateneo made me realize how rich a source of insight my Sanggu experience is in understanding how the government works in the Philippines.
The cool thing about the Sanggunian and its place in the Ateneo community is very much like that of the Philippine government in the country. The structure of the Sanggunian is very much the same as in the real government, only the positions have different names. The Sanggunian, like the national government, functions because of the taxes of the people (in our case, the student activities fund paid as part of the tuition). There so many more parallelisms but they are not the focus of this entry.
What I want to focus on is how do you make a government work effectively and efficiently? Is corruption really the major problem faced internally by the current administration? From my experience in the Sanggunian, I don't think so. The Sanggunian officers, at the very least, are not corrupt (yes, Gadfly will agree as well), precisely because we have a very tight auditing office and the system will simply not allow it. Are the Sanggunian officers incompetent? I don't think so either because most of us are very active and successful in other places like student organizations, outside organizations, non-government organizations and other types of groups. Is it a problem of structure? Maybe but to me I think there is a deeper problem.
I guess my experience in the Sanggunian tells me that corruption is not the only problem and perhaps not even the biggest. I feel that the problem is what corruption breeds - distrust. It is when the people lose confidence in their leaders that authority is crippled. No matter how great a leader is in so many aspects, the people will not see it because of the cataract of distrust placed there by corruption. I feel it is a problem not only of the leaders but of the people as well. It practically cuts off the ties of between leader and people.
I have no idea where the distrust (or perhaps indifference is a better term) toward the Sanggunian comes from. I came into the institution without knowing that this was the situation. But what I do know is that it is a problem that has to be mutually solved by the officers and their consituents. No matter how hard the officers work, if the people refuse to see that, then nothing will come out of it. The people have the responsibility to be vigilant of those they elected because no one else will. If they remain distrustful to the point of indifference, then nothing good will happen for the entire community. I would rather see angry and revolting constituents - at least they know something's wrong and they want to do something about it.
In the context of the national government, this is, I believe, is more applicable. Despite the strength of the macro-economic indicators, the infrastructure projects and other achievements of this administration, a single wrongdoing not even of the highest official erases all of these in the eyes of the people. The greatest weapon against an institution is distrust. This is why terrorism and corruption are powerful. They make people lose trust in the institutions that are supposed to combat both. Although technically the government has not lost the war on terrorism or corruption, both are gradually winning the hearts and minds of people. Both are cultivating the destructive seeds of fear and distrust. Not agreeing to the leaders of the government is one thing. Distrusting the capacity of government to serve the people is another.
The signs of how distrustful the people have become are very obvious. The Human Security Act, the Cybereducation project, the JPEPA. All these are lightning rod issues that are not difficult to resolve if the people trust the government (and if the government is deserving of the trust i.e. they are doing the right thing).
If the government wants genuine progress in our nation, it has to realize that trust is an integral part of it and that it must take concrete steps to win back the trust of the people. I know the Sanggunian is doing just that.
My meeting him and talking to him about my current adventures in Ateneo made me realize how rich a source of insight my Sanggu experience is in understanding how the government works in the Philippines.
The cool thing about the Sanggunian and its place in the Ateneo community is very much like that of the Philippine government in the country. The structure of the Sanggunian is very much the same as in the real government, only the positions have different names. The Sanggunian, like the national government, functions because of the taxes of the people (in our case, the student activities fund paid as part of the tuition). There so many more parallelisms but they are not the focus of this entry.
What I want to focus on is how do you make a government work effectively and efficiently? Is corruption really the major problem faced internally by the current administration? From my experience in the Sanggunian, I don't think so. The Sanggunian officers, at the very least, are not corrupt (yes, Gadfly will agree as well), precisely because we have a very tight auditing office and the system will simply not allow it. Are the Sanggunian officers incompetent? I don't think so either because most of us are very active and successful in other places like student organizations, outside organizations, non-government organizations and other types of groups. Is it a problem of structure? Maybe but to me I think there is a deeper problem.
I guess my experience in the Sanggunian tells me that corruption is not the only problem and perhaps not even the biggest. I feel that the problem is what corruption breeds - distrust. It is when the people lose confidence in their leaders that authority is crippled. No matter how great a leader is in so many aspects, the people will not see it because of the cataract of distrust placed there by corruption. I feel it is a problem not only of the leaders but of the people as well. It practically cuts off the ties of between leader and people.
I have no idea where the distrust (or perhaps indifference is a better term) toward the Sanggunian comes from. I came into the institution without knowing that this was the situation. But what I do know is that it is a problem that has to be mutually solved by the officers and their consituents. No matter how hard the officers work, if the people refuse to see that, then nothing will come out of it. The people have the responsibility to be vigilant of those they elected because no one else will. If they remain distrustful to the point of indifference, then nothing good will happen for the entire community. I would rather see angry and revolting constituents - at least they know something's wrong and they want to do something about it.
In the context of the national government, this is, I believe, is more applicable. Despite the strength of the macro-economic indicators, the infrastructure projects and other achievements of this administration, a single wrongdoing not even of the highest official erases all of these in the eyes of the people. The greatest weapon against an institution is distrust. This is why terrorism and corruption are powerful. They make people lose trust in the institutions that are supposed to combat both. Although technically the government has not lost the war on terrorism or corruption, both are gradually winning the hearts and minds of people. Both are cultivating the destructive seeds of fear and distrust. Not agreeing to the leaders of the government is one thing. Distrusting the capacity of government to serve the people is another.
The signs of how distrustful the people have become are very obvious. The Human Security Act, the Cybereducation project, the JPEPA. All these are lightning rod issues that are not difficult to resolve if the people trust the government (and if the government is deserving of the trust i.e. they are doing the right thing).
If the government wants genuine progress in our nation, it has to realize that trust is an integral part of it and that it must take concrete steps to win back the trust of the people. I know the Sanggunian is doing just that.
Something to remember 12
The cross is one of the most important icons of our faith because it represents the kingship of Jesus on earth. He has two thrones: one on the right hand of the Father, another on the cross.
It is on the cross that He conquered the world - not by force as we humans are so prone to do but by eternal and unconditional love. It is on the cross that He carried the weight of sins past, present and future and claimed a kingdom for Himself in the most unlikely way. He freed us from the bondage of sin on the cross, that we may no longer be slaves to sin and become citizens in the Kingdom of God.
This is why the sign of the cross is important at the beginning and end of the prayer. It is not merely a convenient way of opening and closing a prayer. It is a declaration of the kingship of Jesus in our lives. Nothing can be more beautiful than that.
It is on the cross that He conquered the world - not by force as we humans are so prone to do but by eternal and unconditional love. It is on the cross that He carried the weight of sins past, present and future and claimed a kingdom for Himself in the most unlikely way. He freed us from the bondage of sin on the cross, that we may no longer be slaves to sin and become citizens in the Kingdom of God.
This is why the sign of the cross is important at the beginning and end of the prayer. It is not merely a convenient way of opening and closing a prayer. It is a declaration of the kingship of Jesus in our lives. Nothing can be more beautiful than that.
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
The Root of Apathy
Apathy is defined as the state of indifference - without enthusiasm, emotion or motivation. Apathy is such a buzz word especially in the realm of politics and society, whether it is on the school or even the national level. Many people today seem to not care about what the issue over Erap's trial is about or what is controversial about the National Broadband Network deal. A lot of adults point at the youth as being apathetic but, in fact, a huge number of people - regardless of age, gender, and even social class - are guilty of this as well. In a time when vigilance has become a necessity to ensure our rights are respected and our interests served, apathy is becoming a dominant sentiment in our society today.
I would like to believe that I am a bit of a notch above those who are apathetic to the concerns of society. Knowing is a whole lot different from caring since the latter involves action which I sometimes fail to actually carry out. But I always want to look at the bigger picture and try to search for the truth as much as a 17-year-old student can in this age of unlimited internet access and 24-hour news coverage. The main motivation for me is that I know I will be affected, in one way or another, by what the Senate hearings are about, how big the budget deficit is, or what the verdict of the Supreme Court is on an issue (nevermind the notion of seeing history-in-the-making first hand hehehe). A minority (fortunately a significant minority) see politics and the concern of the greater society as something worth looking in to.
Our capitalist society today is based on the principle that each person is selfish. As Adam Smith puts it in his theory of the invisible hand, in an ideal market economy, every selfish act of a selfish entity in an economy will contribute to the greater good of society. This is why competition and free trade are advocated in capitalism. Though I do not agree with this assumption, this structure of society assumes that every man is selfish - he will not do anything unless it is for his own benefit. I believe this is a big part of the whole root of apathy - that every man thinks only of himself.
I have had quite a number of experiences that have shown me this dark side of humanity. When the school calls for a relief goods drive for victims of a typhoon, very few answer the call. The reasons are varied but perhaps the most frustrating one is that a Starbucks frappuchino is far more important than one day's worth of food for a family. Why should I sacrifice my comfort for people I do not even know?
This selfishness of man is not, of course, the sole cause of apathy. This paradigm still holds even if you look at the instances in our history when people actually went beyond apathy. The Philippine Revolution of the 1890s. The war effort during World War II. EDSA I. EDSA II. All these examples show that the Filipinos can actually stop apathy no matter what the motivations are. Some are altruistic, others selfish,but all contributed to the success of movements that brought social change to our nation. In a more localized setting, the notion of Ateneans being apathetic is somewhat proven wrong by the sheer amount of criticism the implementation of a dress code has received in the past weeks. Again, some of the motivations are noble in the defense of the rights of students while others are more selfish in the pursuit of personal interests to keep their wardrobe and still wear slippers. Selfishness, in all these instances, can actually work to stop apathy but only if man sees the use of caring for his own betterment.
It is when selfishness is combined with another cause that it most likely will translate into apathy. Man is inevitably short-sighted. Despite our tremendous capacity to use our mental faculties to think beyond the abilities of any other creature, we simply cannot pierce through the veil of the future. We think more in terms of today and very seldom of tomorrow. We enjoy today because, as the saying goes, there may not be tomorrow. The same short-sightedness can cause apathy when we are unable to perceive how something could affect our lives in the long run. Most of the big changes in the history of humanity did not come in just one blow. The same is true with politics and the concerns of society. A new law like the Human Security Act passed today may suddenly or gradually change our way of life and we wouldn't even know it because of our apathy. Responsible voting in an election may not translate into food for the table tomorrow but we often fail to see that it could very well affect how much we earn in the coming years.
Looking even deeper into the complicated causes of apathy, it can be observed that selfishness and short-sightedness assume that we have the capacity to think about the bigger picture. However, in our country, not everyone has that luxury. I agree that since our nation is predominantly poor, the bigger cause of apathy is that a larger part of our nation simply cannot think beyond what they have to eat for dinner. What happens is that the minority of those who can shape how society would benefit them and not the poor who are robbed of their opportunity to not be apathetic because of the stigma of poverty. Poverty is a problem that can be solved by government policies, political will and social change. Following the assumptions of selfishness and short-sightedness, the higher classes will not initiate these changes for the poor. The poor cannot push these themselves because their poverty has kept them focused on trying to survive day after day. A big number of our people are deprived of the education that would have allowed them to understand how politics and society work and how they can push for change. An even bigger number simply have to worry about more immediate matters such as food and rents over education. Political apathy and economic degeneration is a chicken-and-egg situation - one cannot clearly discern which came first. Does the economy worsen because people do not care? Or are people too poor already to care anyway?
Apathy, like any other human behavior, is too complex to be understood completely. But the bigger matter is not understanding its causes but acting on it. The fact of the matter is that most of the problems in our society today can be solved if people were actually not apathetic. Corruption can be mitigated with vigilance. Poverty can be fought by a combination of altruistic volunteerism in the short run and revolutionary social change in the long run. Our society and government are structured so that the people get what they deserve - if people are not responsible, society and government will not work for them.
The many events in the past and the things that are happening now has led me to believe that indeed the root of apathy is selfishness, short-sightedness and ignorance. Perhaps this is an incomplete picture but what is clear is that the only answer to this is to show the apathetic that by stopping indifference, we can actually make a difference in this selfish, short-sighted and ignorant world.
I would like to believe that I am a bit of a notch above those who are apathetic to the concerns of society. Knowing is a whole lot different from caring since the latter involves action which I sometimes fail to actually carry out. But I always want to look at the bigger picture and try to search for the truth as much as a 17-year-old student can in this age of unlimited internet access and 24-hour news coverage. The main motivation for me is that I know I will be affected, in one way or another, by what the Senate hearings are about, how big the budget deficit is, or what the verdict of the Supreme Court is on an issue (nevermind the notion of seeing history-in-the-making first hand hehehe). A minority (fortunately a significant minority) see politics and the concern of the greater society as something worth looking in to.
Our capitalist society today is based on the principle that each person is selfish. As Adam Smith puts it in his theory of the invisible hand, in an ideal market economy, every selfish act of a selfish entity in an economy will contribute to the greater good of society. This is why competition and free trade are advocated in capitalism. Though I do not agree with this assumption, this structure of society assumes that every man is selfish - he will not do anything unless it is for his own benefit. I believe this is a big part of the whole root of apathy - that every man thinks only of himself.
I have had quite a number of experiences that have shown me this dark side of humanity. When the school calls for a relief goods drive for victims of a typhoon, very few answer the call. The reasons are varied but perhaps the most frustrating one is that a Starbucks frappuchino is far more important than one day's worth of food for a family. Why should I sacrifice my comfort for people I do not even know?
This selfishness of man is not, of course, the sole cause of apathy. This paradigm still holds even if you look at the instances in our history when people actually went beyond apathy. The Philippine Revolution of the 1890s. The war effort during World War II. EDSA I. EDSA II. All these examples show that the Filipinos can actually stop apathy no matter what the motivations are. Some are altruistic, others selfish,but all contributed to the success of movements that brought social change to our nation. In a more localized setting, the notion of Ateneans being apathetic is somewhat proven wrong by the sheer amount of criticism the implementation of a dress code has received in the past weeks. Again, some of the motivations are noble in the defense of the rights of students while others are more selfish in the pursuit of personal interests to keep their wardrobe and still wear slippers. Selfishness, in all these instances, can actually work to stop apathy but only if man sees the use of caring for his own betterment.
It is when selfishness is combined with another cause that it most likely will translate into apathy. Man is inevitably short-sighted. Despite our tremendous capacity to use our mental faculties to think beyond the abilities of any other creature, we simply cannot pierce through the veil of the future. We think more in terms of today and very seldom of tomorrow. We enjoy today because, as the saying goes, there may not be tomorrow. The same short-sightedness can cause apathy when we are unable to perceive how something could affect our lives in the long run. Most of the big changes in the history of humanity did not come in just one blow. The same is true with politics and the concerns of society. A new law like the Human Security Act passed today may suddenly or gradually change our way of life and we wouldn't even know it because of our apathy. Responsible voting in an election may not translate into food for the table tomorrow but we often fail to see that it could very well affect how much we earn in the coming years.
Looking even deeper into the complicated causes of apathy, it can be observed that selfishness and short-sightedness assume that we have the capacity to think about the bigger picture. However, in our country, not everyone has that luxury. I agree that since our nation is predominantly poor, the bigger cause of apathy is that a larger part of our nation simply cannot think beyond what they have to eat for dinner. What happens is that the minority of those who can shape how society would benefit them and not the poor who are robbed of their opportunity to not be apathetic because of the stigma of poverty. Poverty is a problem that can be solved by government policies, political will and social change. Following the assumptions of selfishness and short-sightedness, the higher classes will not initiate these changes for the poor. The poor cannot push these themselves because their poverty has kept them focused on trying to survive day after day. A big number of our people are deprived of the education that would have allowed them to understand how politics and society work and how they can push for change. An even bigger number simply have to worry about more immediate matters such as food and rents over education. Political apathy and economic degeneration is a chicken-and-egg situation - one cannot clearly discern which came first. Does the economy worsen because people do not care? Or are people too poor already to care anyway?
Apathy, like any other human behavior, is too complex to be understood completely. But the bigger matter is not understanding its causes but acting on it. The fact of the matter is that most of the problems in our society today can be solved if people were actually not apathetic. Corruption can be mitigated with vigilance. Poverty can be fought by a combination of altruistic volunteerism in the short run and revolutionary social change in the long run. Our society and government are structured so that the people get what they deserve - if people are not responsible, society and government will not work for them.
The many events in the past and the things that are happening now has led me to believe that indeed the root of apathy is selfishness, short-sightedness and ignorance. Perhaps this is an incomplete picture but what is clear is that the only answer to this is to show the apathetic that by stopping indifference, we can actually make a difference in this selfish, short-sighted and ignorant world.
Tuesday, October 9, 2007
I spoke too soon
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
What Marvel Hero would you be? created with QuizFarm.com | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| You scored as Professor X Superhuman mental powers: Professor X ordinarily possesses vast psionic powers, including telepathy; the ability to induce in others mental illusions, temporary mental or physical paralysis, and loss of specific memories or total amnesia; the projection of "mental bolts" to stun or render a person unconscious; astral projection; and the ability to sense other superhuman mutants within a small radius
|
Illuminati
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Which member of the Marvel Illuminati are you? created with QuizFarm.com | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| You scored as Mr. Fantastic You are Reed Richards, Mr. Fantastic. As leader of the Fantastic Four, you are a veteran of the superhero community. You are a brilliant scientist and provide a unique analytical perspective to the Illuminati that's backed up by years of expirience. Family is very important to you, and you don't fight unless it's absolutely neccicary.
Cool quiz! hahaha. I would have wanted to be Charles Xavier, but fine, Mr. Fantastic is great as well. I find it funny that I've been reading a lot of Marvel stuff these past few weeks via marvel.com (they have free digital comics and an encyclopedia of almost every marvel character in the marvel universe). I've learned a lot more about the "dark sides" of these guys by reading actual comics as compared to just watching the animated series or the movies. I find Marvel great because they give a human side (both good and bad) to these superhuman guys. Weighing between Xavier and Mr. Fantastic based on their dark sides, I'd like Mr. Fantastic more but Xavier's power is still something great to have. |
Thursday, October 4, 2007
Something to remember 11
My life is an instant,
An hour which passes by;
My life is a moment
Which I have no power to stay.
You know, O my God,
That to love You here on earth -
I have only today.
- Prayer of St. Therese of Liseux
An hour which passes by;
My life is a moment
Which I have no power to stay.
You know, O my God,
That to love You here on earth -
I have only today.
- Prayer of St. Therese of Liseux
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
